Cases 1 - 10 of 568
Save The Colorado, et al v. City and County of Denver
as 25-1231
Petitioner:
SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water), LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM H. GRAHAM, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOUGLAS J. BURGUM, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Desert Tortoise Council et al v. Burgum et al
as 4:2025cv00272
Plaintiff:
Desert Tortoise Council, Tucson Herpetological Society, Western Watersheds Project and others
Defendant:
Doug Burgum, United States Department of the Interior, Paul Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 25-8026
Plaintiff:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant:
BROOKE L. ROLLINS, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor:
STATE OF WYOMING
WildEarth Guardians v. Hoffman et al
as 3:2025cv00745
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
Amanda Hoffman and Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Save The Colorado, et al v. Graham, et al
as 25-1137
Petitioner:
SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water), LIEUTENANT GENERAL WILLIAM H. GRAHAM, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOUGLAS J. BURGUM, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2025cv00947
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, DOUGLAS J. BURGUM and others
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, SIERRA CLUB and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
as 1:2025cv00885
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant:
U.S. FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Montana Environmental Information Center, et al. v. State of Montana, et al.
as 25-1234
Plaintiff:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and others
Defendant:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, CHRISTOPHER DORRINGTON, in his official capacity as director of Montana Department of Environmental Quality and DAN WALSH, in his official capacity as Bureau Chief of the Mining Bureau of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality
Intervenor:
STATE OF MONTANA, by and through Austin Knudsen, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Montana, AUSTIN KNUDSEN, Attorney General of the State of Montana and WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING, LLC
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS v. BURGUM et al
as 1:2025cv00452
Plaintiff:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DOUGLAS J. BURGUM and PAUL SOUZA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 2:2025cv00033
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC, Westmoreland Mining LLC, Westmoreland Rosebud Mining LLC and others
Respondent:
Andrew Archuleta, Sonya Germann, United States Department of Interior Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
