Ronald W. Jonker v. Michael J. Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Ronald W. Jonker v. Michael J. Astrue

Ronald W. Jonker v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Ronald W. Jonker
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	2:2009cv03948
Filed:	June 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Carter
Presiding Judge:	Abrams
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 27, 2010	Filing 24 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $3400.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 23 (ch)
June 29, 2010	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff's request for reversal, or in the alternative, remand, is granted; (2) the decision of the Commissioner is reversed; and (3) this action i s remanded to defendant for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on all parties or their counsel. This Memorandum Opinion and Order is not intended for publication, nor is it intended to be included in or submitted to any online service such as Westlaw or Lexis. See Order for details. (ch)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 27, 2010

Filing 24 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $3400.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 23 (ch)

June 29, 2010

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) plaintiff's request for reversal, or in the alternative, remand, is granted; (2) the decision of the Commissioner is reversed; and (3) this action i s remanded to defendant for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on all parties or their counsel. This Memorandum Opinion and Order is not intended for publication, nor is it intended to be included in or submitted to any online service such as Westlaw or Lexis. **See Order for details.** (ch)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ronald W. Jonker v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald W. Jonker
Represented By:	Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?