Adriana Mendez Madrigal et al v. City of Santa Maria et al
| G. M., Adriana Mendez Madrigal, Jaime Madrigal, J. M. and A. M. |
| Chief of Police Danny R. Macagni, Officer Gowing, Officer Mendoza, Does, Officer Gerue, City of Santa Maria and Officer Totorica |
| 2:2010cv04479 |
| June 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendants motions to dismiss 23 24 . Thus, based on the foregoing, Defendants motions are: (1) GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs fifth cause of action for supervisory liability; ( 2) DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs sixth and seventh causes of action for municipal liability under Monell and City of Canton; (3)GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs eighth cause of action for violation of due process; (4) DENIED with respect to Pla intiffs twelfth and thirteenth causes of action for violation of California civil rights statutes against City Defendants; and (5) GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs eleventh through eighteenth causes of action for state law violations against CountyDefendants. Plaintiffs have until February 28, 2011 to amend the pleadings in accordance with this Order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the claims with prejudice IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
