Betty E. Walton v. Michael J. Astrue

Betty E. Walton v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Betty E. Walton
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	2:2010cv08386
Filed:	November 4, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 3, 2011	Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Pursuant to the Order 24 it is ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
July 11, 2011	Filing 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. Accordingly, on or before August 5, 2011, plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) show good cause in writing, if any exists, why plaintiff did not timely file her motionfor judgment on the pleadings , and why the Court should not recommend that thisaction be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts prior Order; or (b) serve and file her motion for judgment on the pleadings in accordance with the format specified in the November 8, 2010 Order. ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/5/2011.) (twdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 3, 2011

Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Pursuant to the Order 24 it is ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and for failure to prosecute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)

July 11, 2011

Filing 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. Accordingly, on or before August 5, 2011, plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) show good cause in writing, if any exists, why plaintiff did not timely file her motionfor judgment on the pleadings , and why the Court should not recommend that thisaction be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts prior Order; or (b) serve and file her motion for judgment on the pleadings in accordance with the format specified in the November 8, 2010 Order. ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/5/2011.) (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betty E. Walton v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Ann L Maley
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Betty E. Walton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?