Pankaj Patel v. Flushmate
Petitioner: Pankaj Patel
Respondent: Flushmate
Case Number: 2:2013cv02428
Filed: April 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: S. James Otero
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES, AND INCENTIVE AWARDS TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVES by Judge S. James Otero. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (lc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pankaj Patel v. Flushmate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Flushmate
Represented By: Robert F Scoular
Represented By: Steven H Frankel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pankaj Patel
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Represented By: Mark John Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?