Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEM, INC. v. JANVI SAGAR, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00583
Plaintiff: BAYMONT FRANCHISE SYSTEM, INC.
Defendant: JANVI SAGAR, LLC, PANKAJ PATEL and NISHA PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KUMAR et al v. BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv11048
Defendant: PANKAJ PATEL, BAPS MERCER LLC, BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: BRAJENDRA, NIRANJAN PAPPU, DEVI LAAL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Weintraub v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05870
Defendant: Pankaj Patel, Michael Reiss, Todd H. Siegel and others
Plaintiff: Eric Weintraub
Bushansky v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv06513
Defendant: Pankaj Patel, Michael Reiss, Todd H. Siegel and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Bushansky
Lin v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv09059
Plaintiff: Mitsuko K Lin
Defendant: Pankaj Patel, Bob Cagnazzi, Todd H. Siegel and others
Rosenblatt v. Presidio, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01811
Defendant: Pankaj Patel, Bob Cagnazzi, Todd H. Siegel and others
Plaintiff: Jordan Rosenblatt
Patel v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01506
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Pankaj Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta v. Piccard Enterprises et al
as 8:2018cv01961
Defendant: Piccard Enterprises LLC, Pankaj Patel and Binoy Paterl
Plaintiff: R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Patel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01540
Defendant: Pankaj Patel and Varsha Patel
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?