KUMAR et al v. BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC. et al
| BRAJENDRA, NIRANJAN PAPPU, DEVI LAAL, MUKESH KUMAR and KESHAV KUMAR |
| PANKAJ PATEL, BAPS MERCER LLC, BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC., KANU PATEL, SWAMI PRASANAND, BAPS FELLOWSHIP SERVICES, INC., BHARAT DOE and BAPS ROBBINSVILLE LLC |
| 3:2021cv11048 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Tonianne J Bongiovanni |
| Anne E Thompson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by PAUL JOSEPH FISHMAN on behalf of BAPS FELLOWSHIP SERVICES, INC., BAPS MERCER LLC, BAPS ROBBINSVILLE LLC, BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC., BHARAT DOE, KANU PATEL, PANKAJ PATEL, SWAMI PRASANAND (FISHMAN, PAUL) |
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER that Defendants shall have until 8/30/2021 to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni on 6/29/2021. (jem)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by BRAJENDRA, KESHAV KUMAR, MUKESH KUMAR, DEVI LAAL, NIRANJAN PAPPU of Filing Consent to Join (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join)(GLENN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BAPS FELLOWSHIP SERVICES, INC., BAPS MERCER LLC, BAPS ROBBINSVILLE LLC, BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC., BHARAT DOE. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (mg) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by BRAJENDRA, KESHAV KUMAR, MUKESH KUMAR, DEVI LAAL, NIRANJAN PAPPU. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Certification, #3 Certification, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(GLENN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by BRAJENDRA, KESHAV KUMAR, MUKESH KUMAR, DEVI LAAL, NIRANJAN PAPPU of Filing Consent to Joins (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(GLENN, ANDREW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BAPS FELLOWSHIP SERVICES, INC., BAPS MERCER LLC, BAPS ROBBINSVILLE LLC, BOCHASANWASI SHRI AKSHAR PURUSHOTTAM SWAMINARAYAN SANSTHA, INC., BHARAT DOE, KANU PATEL, PANKAJ PATEL, SWAMI PRASANAND ( Filing and Admin fee $ 402 receipt number ANJDC-12451440) with JURY DEMAND, filed by DEVI LAAL, KESHAV KUMAR, MUKESH KUMAR, NIRANJAN PAPPU, BRAJENDRA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(GLENN, ANDREW) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 6/7/2021 before Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (jem) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 First MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion set for 6/7/2021 before Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (mg) |
| Judge Anne E. Thompson and Magistrate Judge Tonianne J. Bongiovanni added. (mg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
