District of New Jersey Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 91,374
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05171
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC.
as 2:2016cv05170
Plaintiff: DAMON SMITH
Defendant: WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LUPIAN et al v. JOSEPH CORY HOLDINGS LLC
as 2:2016cv05172
Plaintiff: ALEJANDRO LUPIAN , JUAN LUPIAN , JOSE REYES and others
Defendant: JOSEPH CORY HOLDINGS LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
DELASSANTOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05183
Plaintiff: ABSALON DELASSANTOS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Federal Tort Claims Act
SCHWARZMER v. CITIBANK et al
as 3:2016cv05169
Plaintiff: AVRAHAM D SCHWARZMER
Defendant: CITIBANK, BEST BUY CREDIT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. NTR HOSPITALITY, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv05165
Plaintiff: WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant: NTR HOSPITALITY, L.L.C., VIJAY PATEL, ANUP PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Franchise
KILBERG v. DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
as 3:2016cv05168
Plaintiff: YAAKOV KILBERG
Defendant: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05175
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THE PROVIDENT BANK v. HERING et al
as 3:2016cv05174
Plaintiff: THE PROVIDENT BANK
Defendant: MICHAEL J. HERING, TRACI M. HERING
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAMRICK v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 3:2016cv05176
Plaintiff: RICKY HAMRICK
Defendant: BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER AG and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?