SMITH v. HOME DEPOT, INC. et al
| MELISHA SMITH |
| HOME DEPOT, INC., JOHN DOE 1-10 (fictitiously named), ABC Co., 1-10 (fictitiously named), XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10 (fictitiously named construction, maintenance, repair, and/or property management corporations) and VNO 2445 SPRINGFIELD AVE ECOVA, INC. |
| 2:2024cv08055 |
| July 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Leda D Wettre |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Third Party Litigation Funding disclosure statement pursuant to L.Civ.R 7.1.1(a)(1-3) filed by HOME DEPOT, INC.. (PETERS, NADA) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by HOME DEPOT, INC.. (PETERS, NADA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by HOME DEPOT, INC. from Superior Court of Union County, case number UNN-L-000184-24. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 405 receipt number ANJDC-15546445), filed by HOME DEPOT, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Defendant's Answer in State Court, #3 Exhibit C - Plaintiff's Responses to Interrogatories, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavits of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Certification of Service)(PETERS, NADA) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
