Colorado River Indian Tribes et al v. Department of Interior et al
| Colorado River Indian Tribes |
| Sally Jewell, John Kalish, James G Kenna, Neil Kornze, Teri Raml, United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Department of the Interior |
| NextEra Blythe Solar Energy Center, LLC |
| 5:2014cv02504 |
| December 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Sheri Pym |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that final judgment is entered in favor of Federal Defendants United States Department of the Interior; Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM); NeilKornze, in his official capacity as Director of BLM; James G. Kenna, in his official capacity as BLM California State Director; Teri Raml, in her official capacity as District Manager, BLM California Desert District; John Kalish, in his official capacity as Field Manager, BLM Palm Springs/South Coast Field Office; in favor of Intervenor Defendant NextEra Blythe Solar Energy Center, LLC; and against Plaintiff Colorado River Indian Tribes on all claims set forth in Plaintiffs complaint, and the case is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
