Cases 1 - 10 of 423
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-2533
Plaintiff:
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALASKA, NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, VENETIE VILLAGE COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior and others
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
as 1:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity and Maricopa Audubon Society
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Land Management and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Arizona State Legislature et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv08026
Plaintiff:
Arizona State Legislature, Kimberly Yee, Mohave, County of and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr., Deb Haaland, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Tohono O'odham Nation et al v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 4:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tohono O'odham Nation, San Carlos Apache Tribe, Archaeology Southwest and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior, Deb Haaland and United States Bureau of Land Management
Intervenor:
SunZia Transmission LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Western Watersheds Project v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-4293
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAND CANYON CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB
Desert Protection Society v. Haaland, et al.
as 23-4263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESERT PROTECTION SOCIETY
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, KAREN MOURITSEN, in her official capacity as State Director of the United States Bureau of Land Management for California, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
EAGLE CREST ENERGY COMPANY, INC.
Sovereign Inupiat for a Living Arctic, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3627
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOVEREIGN INUPIAT FOR A LIVING ARCTIC, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
