Mattox v. Castrol, et al.
John Dean Mattox |
Castrol, E. Martinez, Marquez, Alexander, Steadman, M. T. Ervan, Harris, Hermon, F. Igbinoza and Paco Mendoza |
1:2010cv01641 |
September 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Gary S. Austin |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER REVOKING IFP STATUS, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 5/17/2013. (cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.) (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 20 DISMISSAL ORDER signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 5/3/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 17 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE re Continuing This Action signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 4/15/2013. Plaintiff's Show Cause Response due by 5/17/2013. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 12 ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Administratively Close 1:12-cv-1991-BAM(PC), and File Letters in Case 1:10-cv-01641-LJO-GSA, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/7/12. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 8 ORDER VACATING 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/23/2010. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Case be DISMISSED based on plaintiff's failure to obey the courts order of September 17, 2010, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/17/2010, referred to Judge Wanger. Objections to F&R due by 12/20/2010. (Marrujo, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.