Cases 1 - 10 of 25,123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Roxburgh v. Yogis Teriyaki & Grill Incorported
as 2:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Alexander Roxburgh
Defendant:
Yogis Teriyaki & Grill Incorported
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Pacheco et al v. Culturalink, LLC
as 4:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
Cibelli Pacheco, Ishchenko Hanna and Alexander Pogorelov
Defendant:
Culturalink, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Clark v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
George Lee Clark
Defendant:
Dr. Eben Alexander, III, Simon and Shuster, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brandon Favor v. Marcus Musante
as 23-70051
Petitioner:
BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent:
MARCUS MUSANTE, California Prosecutor
Dyneka Collier v. 1940 Carmen LLC, et al
as 23-55283
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DYNEKA COLLIER, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
1940 CARMEN LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, ALEXANDER G. STEIN, an individual and ESTHER STEIN, an individual
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive
Alexander, Jr. v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Curtis T. Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06886
Plaintiff:
DINESHIA ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gray v. Evanston of et al
as 1:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
Alexander Gray
Defendant:
City Evanston of, Officer Kubiak, Officer Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
