Manago v. Cate
Petitioner: Stewart Manago
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Case Number: 1:2011cv01172
Filed: July 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion For The Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 27 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/20/2012. (Fahrney, E)
October 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/22/2012 recommending that 22 MOTION to DISMISS be granted. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 11/26/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
August 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations 21 ; ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion for an Order Directing Prison Staff to Permit Petitioner to Communicate with Inmate Witnesses 17 ; ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Intervention and Protective Order 18 , signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/8/12. (Verduzco, M)
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER DENYING Without Prejudice 16 Petitioner's Motion for Discovery, Protective Order and Hearing; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 17 Petitioner's Motion for an Order Directing Prison Staff to Permit Petitioner to Commun icate With Inmate Witnesses Be DENIED and that 18 Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Intervention and Procective Order be DENIED re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/11/2012. Referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
March 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Granting Petitioner's Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 11 ), Setting Aside The Dismissal Of The Petition (Doc. 9 ), And Directing That The Judgment Be Vacated (Doc. 10 ), ORDER Deeming Petitioner's Motion For Reconsideration To Be A Supplement To The Petition (Docs. 11 , 1 ), ORDER Requiring Respondent To File A Response To The Petition As Supplemented, ORDER Setting A Briefing Schedule, ORDER Directing The Clerk To Serve Documents On The Attorney General, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/27/2012. (Fahrney, E)
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING CASE and declining to issue a certificate of appealability signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/26/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/3/11. (Verduzco, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manago v. Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stewart Manago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?