Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Stewart Manago v. Daniel E. Cueva et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart Manago v. City of Barstow et al
as 5:2021cv02032
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
City of Barstow, Miriam I Morton, Bryan Stoognill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manago v. City of Barstow et al
as 1:2021cv01708
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
City of Barstow, Miriam I. Morton, Bryan Stoognill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart Manago v. M. Martinez et al
as 5:2021cv01939
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
M. Martinez, R. Garcia, R. Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Manago v. Santoro et al
as 1:2021cv01616
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, Kevin Hixon, R. Philpott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Manago v. Santoro et al
as 1:2021cv01464
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, Kevin Hixon, J. Jeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart Manago v. John McMahon et al
as 5:2021cv01370
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
John McMahon, Brad Bonnet, B. Faylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart Manago v. John McMahon et al
as 5:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, Marshal, Stoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart Manago v. M. Martinez, et al
as 21-55283
Defendant / Appellee:
D. HUBBARD, Facility Lieutenant, in individual and official capacity, D. JACKSON, Deputy, in individual and official capacity, A. PRINCE, Deputy, in individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEWART MANAGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
