Rodgers v. Sisto et al
| Kenneth Scott Rodgers |
| D. K. Sisto, Board of Parole Hearings, State of California and Attorney General of the State of California |
| 2:2007cv02383 |
| November 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Riverside |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 3/3/11 ORDERING the Motion to Alter Judgment at Docket No. 17 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Judgment entered at Docket No. 16 is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 1/7/2011 ORDERING that 1 Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the denial of parole is vacated and this matter is remanded to the Californ ia Board of Parole Hearings for further proceedings consistent with the decisions of the California Supreme Court in re Lawrence, and in re Shaputis, as interpreted by Hayward v Marshall, Pearson v Munitz, and Pirtle v CA Board of Prison Terms. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, if the Board of Parole Hearings has not held a hearing within 120 days of the date of entry of this Order, the Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation must release Rodgers to parole status. The Clerk of the Court is to enter final judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/14/07 ORDERING petitioner to submit within 30 days from this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. Clerk is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Carlos, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
