Cases 1 - 10 of 881
Abreu v. Travers
as 19-564
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Lira, Superintendent for Programs, Bellinier, Deputy Commissioner, Rabideau, Nurse Administrator 2
and others
Defendant:
R. Isobella, Lt., White, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, Garland, C.O.
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CALA
as 18-71431
:
In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
D. K. SISTO, Warden
Charles Reece v. D. Sisto, et al
as 18-15517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGORY REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden, DON MIMIS, Plant Opreation
Abreu v. Traver
as 17-2981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Travers, Nurse, Lashway, Nurse Practitioner, Kornigsmann, Chief Medical Officer
and others
Defendant:
Bellamy, Director Inmate Grievance, White, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, Woodward, Assistant Inmate Grievance Supervisor
and others
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel, Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Reece v. D. Sisto, et al
as 17-15247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGORY REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden, DON MIMIS, Plant Opreation
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CALA
as 16-73732
:
In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
D. K. SISTO, Warden
Abreu v. Travers et al
as 9:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Travers, Lashway, Kornigsmann
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
William Townsend, Jr. v. D. Sisto, et al
as 14-15590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM TOWNSEND, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden, T. CHERRY, M. JUNKER
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
