Brownlee v. Clayton et al
Plaintiff: Terrence Brownlee
Defendant: R. Clayton, P. Sahota, I. Cardeno, M. C. Kramer, N. Unannlis and D. Jackson
Case Number: 2:2008cv00661
Filed: March 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 109 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/6/13 recommending that defendants November 11, 2012 motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 93 , be granted. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
January 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER denying 100 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/14/13. (Plummer, M)
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/11/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 98 motion for an extension of time is granted; and Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file his opposition. (Kastilahn, A)
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/11/12 DENYING 91 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
August 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/3/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/20/12 [ 89 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's MOTION for TRO/Preliminary Injunctive Relief, filed 6/18/12 88 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 89 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/20/2012 recommending that 88 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Terrence Brownlee be denied. Motion referred to Judge Law rence K. Karlton. Any party may filed objections to findings and recommendations within 14 days after being served. Parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. (Waggoner, D)
April 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/03/12 ordering that defendants Clayton, Kansier and Sahota must file their answer to the modified claims within 30 days of the filed date of this order. (Plummer, M)
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/29/2012 ORDERING 76 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in full; 41 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; 61 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; this action shall proceed as to defendants Clayton, Kansier an d Sahota solely on plaintiff's claim that they were deliberately indifferent to plaintitt's serious medical condition when the chrono restriction indicating that plaintiff was not the have to get down during alarms was removed. (Waggoner, D)
August 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/11/2011 ORDERING that Pltf's 45 Motion Pursuant to FRCP 50 is DENIED. Pltf's 48 and 57 Motions for Default Judgment are DENIED. Pltf's 54 and 66 Replies are DISREGARDED. Dfts' 67 Motion to Strike Pltf's 66 Surreply to Dfts' 64 Reply is DENIED as moot. IT IS RECOMMENDED that the 41 Motion to Dismiss on behalf of dfts Stocker and Grannis be granted. The 61 Motion to Dismiss on behalf of dfts Clayton, Kansier and Sahota be denied. This action proceed as to dfts Clayton, Kansier and Sahota solely. Motions referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
May 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 05/09/11 ordering that the following are vacated from this court's calendar, subject to being re-noticed by the court following the resolution of plaintiff's interlocutory appeal. Plai ntiff's motion pursuant to FRCP 50, filed on 09/29/10 45 . Plaintiff's motions for default judgment, filed on 10/06/10 48 and on 11/03/10 57 . Defendants 01/21/11 motion 67 to strike plaintiff's surreply 66 to defendants' reply 64 . The motion to dismiss filed on 09/23/10 41 on behalf of defendants Stocker and Grannis. The motion to dismiss filed on 12/13/10 61 on behalf of Calyton, Kansier and Sahota.(Plummer, M)
January 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/11/2011 ADOPTING 59 Findings and Recommendations in full. Pltf's 58 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
November 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/10/2010 RECOMMENDING that Pltf's 58 request for injunctive relief be denied. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/25/10 denying 50 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/06/10 ordering plaintiff's request for judicial intervention filed on 09/23/10 43 is granted to the extent set forth above, and defendants' counsel is directed to file and serve the appropriate response as outlined above within 21 days. Plaintiff's third request for appointment of counsel filed on 09/23/10 42 is denied. (Plummer, M)
July 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/19/10 ordering the clerk of the court is directed to send to plaintiff 2 USM-285 forms, along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the 1/08/10 second amended complaint to be completed and returned within 60 days. (Plummer, M)
May 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/28/2010 ADOPTING 26 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dfts I. Cardeno, B. Jones, D. Jackson, M. Dangler, C. Hammond, Palmer, D.L. Porter, S.L. Chapman, B. Dunlap, and Kramer are DISMISSED from this action. (Engbretson, K.)
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/05/10 recommending that defendants Cardeno, Jones, Jackson, Dangler, Hammond, Palmer, Porter, Chapman, Dunlap, Kramer be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
December 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/23/09 ADOPTING 18 Findings and Recommendations in full. The case is dismissed without prejudice as to all dfts. Pltf is given 30 days from service of this order to file an amended complaint. If Pltf chooses to file an amended complaint, he must set forth in detail how dfts' actions or failures to act deprived him of his constitutional rights. (Engbretson, K.)
October 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/8/09 RECOMMENDING that defendants P. Sahota, I. Cardeno, M. Dangler, S.L. Chapman, D. Jackson, J. Nepomuceno, Swingle and T. Roberson be dismissed from this action. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brownlee v. Clayton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrence Brownlee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P. Sahota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I. Cardeno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. C. Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Unannlis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?