Scott v. Sisto
Petitioner: Noel Phillipe Scott
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Case Number: 2:2008cv02370
Filed: October 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/29/11: The Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Respondent is directed to correct Scott's disciplinary record in the manner otherwise provided by California law to reflect a finding of not guilty of the charges in the Rules Violation Report dated June 28, 2006. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly. (Kaminski, H)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER denying 23 Motion for an evidentiary hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/10/11. (Plummer, M)
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/14/2010 ORDERING 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full; Petitioner's motions for a temporary restraining order 19 22 are denied. (Matson, R)
July 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/02/10 recommending that petitioner's motion for a temporary restraining order 19 and 22 be denied. MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 19 MOTION for leave to amend TRO 22 filed by Noel Phillipe Scott. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
May 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 AMENDED ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/26/10 ORDERING the 20 Order is AMENDED as follows: Petitioner has 60 days in which to file a traverse. Respondent shall, within 7 days of the entry of the original order, file a response to the motion for a temporary restraining order, addressing petitioner's medical needs and the prison's provision for those needs now that petitioner is in administrative segregation. (Donati, J)
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/26/2010 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations in full. Resp's 13 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Resp file an answer to the petition within 30 days of this order. (Engbretson, K.)
February 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/26/2010 recommending that 13 MOTION to DISMISS filed by D. K. Sisto be denied and respondent be ordered to file an answer to the petition no later than 30 days after any adoption of these findings and recommendations. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)
April 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/2/09 ORDERING Respondents to file a response to petitioners application within 60 days from the date of this order. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application; Petitioners reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of an answer; if the response to petitioners application is a motion, petitioners opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of the motion, and respondents reply, if any, shall be filed within 15 days thereafter; and the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. (Carlos, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Noel Phillipe Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. K. Sisto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?