Hariguchi v. Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. et al
| Yoichi Hariguchi |
| Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. and Integrated Device Technology, Inc. |
| 4:2010cv02203 |
| May 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/113/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/25/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 41 Motion FOR REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE FOR SETTLEMENT AND CONTINUANCE OF MARKMAN HEARING (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 Stipulation filed by Netlogic Microsystems, Inc., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Yoichi Hariguchi. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/4/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 Stipulation, filed by Netlogic Microsystems, Inc., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Yoichi Hariguchi. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/3/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2011)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING 33 Stipulation filed by Netlogic Microsystems, Inc., Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Yoichi Hariguchi. Signed by Judge Beeler on 11/18/10. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
