Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02155
Defendant:
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bell Semiconductor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Neeld v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv07217
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Neeld
Defendant:
Ken Kannappan, Gordon W Parnell, Selena L Lacroix and others
Wang v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01885
Defendant:
Ken Kannappan, Robert A. Rango, Selena Loh LaCroix and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Rosenblatt v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01860
Defendant:
Ken Kannappan, Robert A. Rango, Selena Loh LaCroix and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
DIFF Scale Operation Research, LLC v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00373
Defendant:
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DIFF Scale Operation Research, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Vladimir Gusinsky Rev. Trust v. GigPeak, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Gusinsky Rev. Trust
Defendant:
GigPeak, Inc., Avi Katz, Neil J. Miotto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
North Star Innovations, Inc v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
as 8:2016cv02055
Defendant:
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
North Star Innovations, Inc
Logic I, Inc. v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00296
Defendant:
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Logic I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Maxim I Properties v. Krohn et al
as 5:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Maxim l Properties
Defendant:
A.M. Bud Krohn, Ultra-Chem International, Inc, Moyer Products, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
BALA IC, INC. v. INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2011cv07403
Plaintiff:
BALA IC, INC.
Defendant:
INTEGRATED DEVICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
