Neeld v. Integrated Device Technology, Inc. et al
| Jonathan Neeld |
| Ken Kannappan, Gordon W Parnell, Selena L Lacroix, Norm Taffe, Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Gregory L Waters, Robert A Rango and Umesh Padval |
| 3:2018cv07217 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan Illston |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2019 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 01, 17th Floor. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
| Filing 10 Case assigned to Judge Susan Illston. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2018) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Selena L Lacroix waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Norm Taffe waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Robert A Rango waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Gordon W Parnell waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Umesh Padval waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Ken Kannappan waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Gregory L Waters waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Jonathan Neeld. Service waived by Integrated Device Technology, Inc. waiver sent on 12/4/2018, answer due 2/4/2019. (Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 12/4/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Integrated Device Technology, Inc., Ken Kannappan, Selena L Lacroix, Umesh Padval, Gordon W Parnell, Robert A Rango, Norm Taffe, Gregory L Waters ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12884563.). Filed byJonathan Neeld. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Elkins, Joel) (Filed on 11/29/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
