Cruz Davis v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Denise R. Cruz Davis
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2011cv01819
Filed: April 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton
Presiding Judge: Nandor J. Vadas
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 33 Motion to Alter Judgment (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2012)
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 7/23/12. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cruz Davis v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise R. Cruz Davis
Represented By: Norman Straus Nayfach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Cynthia B. De Nardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?