Foster v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Aron Foster, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 5:2007cv03782
Filed: July 24, 2007
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Referring Judge: Richard Seeborg
Presiding Judge: Ronald M. Whyte
Nature of Suit: Social Security: Black Lung
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 27, 2009 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting 11 Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009)
March 27, 2009 18 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Whyte on 3/27/09. (rmwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2009)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foster v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aron Foster, Jr.
Represented By: Betty Herrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.