Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics
| 3:2005cv02125 |
| November 14, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| John S. Rhoades |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
432
ORDER (1) Granting 428 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; and (2) Granting 427 Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs and Class Representative Award. The Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs and Class Representative Service Award and dismisses this action with prejudice with the terms of the Settlement. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/20/2017. (mpl)
|
|
Filing
374
ORDER Denying 310 MOTION to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert Witness filed by XPO Last Mile, Inc. Having considered the parties' arguments and the law, the Court denies defendant's Motion. It is ordered that the Court is s atisfied that at this time Plaintiff's Expert should not be barred from testifying pursuant to any of defendant's asserted grounds. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Exclude is denied. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/23/2017.(dxj)
|
|
Filing
366
ORDER Granting 352 Ex Parte Motion to File Sur-Reply And 328 Motion for Attorneys' Fees And Costs. It is ordered that plaintiffs' counsel are awarded $21,967.50 in attorney fees. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/20/2017. (dxj)
|
|
Filing
321
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 301 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/19/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm)
|
|
Filing
216
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Following Remand Finding Plaintiff and Absent Class Members Properly Classified as Independent Contractors. The Court Finds in Favor of Defendant. The clerk shall close the file.Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/27/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jao)
|
|
Filing
187
CLERK'S JUDGMENT IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of Affinity Logistics Corporation.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mkz) (av1).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
