Southern District of California Cases
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 42,836
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02198
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02197
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02187
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Cunningham v. Pacific Business Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02189
Defendant:
Pacific Business Management, Inc., Does 1 Through 10
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Cause Of Action: FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
The Decor Corporation Pty Ltd v. Aldi Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02196
Defendant:
Aldi Inc., Fresh Source International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Decor Corporation Pty Ltd
Cause Of Action: Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Coleman v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC
as 3:2018cv02192
Plaintiff:
Leila Coleman
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Firstsource Advantage, LLC
Cause Of Action: FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
