Fesharaki v. Blinken et al
| Amirmehdi Jafari Fesharaki |
| Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Department of State, United States Department of Homeland Security, Carolyn Ratzlaff and Consular Officers |
| 3:2024cv00755 |
| April 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Linda Lopez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (axc1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony Blinken, Consular Officers, Alejandro Mayorkas, Carolyn Ratzlaff, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of State ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18797129.), filed by Amirmehdi Jafari Fesharaki. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit List, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit 11, #14 Exhibit 12)The new case number is 3:24-cv-755-LL-JLB. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (David, Kristina)(axc1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
