US District Court for the Southern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,077
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Josue Israel Sanchez
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera Guzman v. Kanilowski et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Glyndon Rivera Guzman
Defendant:
Sim von Kanilowski, Summer Stephan, David Uyar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brazee v. Imperial County Jail Medical Staff
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Brazee
Defendant:
Imperial County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Legaspy Chacon v. Majors
as 3:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Miguel Alberto Legaspy Chacon
Respondent:
Barbara Lee Majors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Lionel Tate, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Barnes
as 3:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Bianca R Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant:
Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonsalves v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 3:2024cv00758
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
