Coyne v. County of San Diego et al
Kathleen Coyne |
County of San Diego, County of San Diego Department of the Public Defender and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive |
3:2008cv00639 |
April 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
San Diego |
Leo S. Papas |
Janis L. Sammartino |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER denying 138 Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/20/11. (lmt) |
Filing 73 ORDER re Motions in Limine; Scheduling Pretrial Conference and Other Dates: A final pretrial conference is scheduled for 7/15/10 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 6. Memoranda of contentions of fact and law due 6/14/10. The proposed final pretrial conference o rder shall be lodged by 6/28/10. The Court grants without prejudice Plaintiff's 60 motion in limine No. 6; grants in part and denies in part without prejudice Defendants' 50 motion in limine No. 1, Defendant's 54 motion in limin e No. 5, Plaintiff's 58 motion in limine No. 4, Plaintiff's 59 motion in limine No. 5; and denies without prejudice Defendant's 51 motion in limine No. 2, Defendant's 52 motion in limine No. 3, Defendant's 53 motion in limine No. 4, Plaintiff's 55 motion in limine No. 1, Plaintiff's 56 motion in limine No. 2, and Plaintiff's 57 motion in limine No. 3. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/4/10. (mkz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.