Rojas-Vega v. Cejka et al
| Dany Rojas-Vega |
| T Diane Cejka and Wayne K Willis |
| 3:2009cv02489 |
| November 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| None |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER Sua Sponte Dismissing Third Amended Complaint without Leave to Amend for Failing to State a Claim (Doc. No. 26 ). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/10/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER: Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint for Failing to State a Claim; Denying 14 Motion for Court Order to Serve Complaint. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the date this Order is filed to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 2/21/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)(jrd)(mam).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER: (1) Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing 1 Complaint for Failing to State a Claim without Prejudice; (3) Denying 7 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; (4) Denying [3-2] Motion for Leave to Electronically File Documents. Plaintiff is Granted forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order is filed to file an amended complaint.Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 4/14/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
