Ferreira v. Groupon, Inc. et al
| Anthony Ferreira |
| Groupon, Inc., Nordstrom, Inc. and DOES |
| 3:2011cv00132 |
| January 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Louisa S Porter |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Ferreira. Nordstrom, Inc. served on 1/24/2011, answer due 2/14/2011. (Tran, Phong) (lao). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Ferreira. Groupon, Inc. served on 1/24/2011, answer due 2/14/2011. (Tran, Phong) (lao). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Phong Le Tran on behalf of Anthony Ferreira (Tran, Phong) (lao). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (yeb) (cap). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Anthony Ferreira (yeb) (cap). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES, Groupon, Inc., Nordstrom, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0974-3235682.), filed by Anthony Ferreira.The new case number is 3:11-cv-132-DMS-POR. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter are assigned to the case. (Jensen, Rachel)(yeb) (cap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
