Holt v. MacArthur et al
| Tracy Holt |
| Unknown Doctors and Chief Medical Officer, Hunt, Sedeghi, Seely, Canlas, Stewart, MacArthur and Calderon |
| 3:2011cv01502 |
| July 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: This action is Dismissed With Prejudice, in its entirety; Except as set forth in the settlement agreement between the Parties, each party shall bear its own fees and costs. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER Adopting 76 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and Granting 69 Defendants' Motion to Enforce Settlement. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/10/2014. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(srm)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Denying 31 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/29/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER (1) granting 16 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint; and (2) Directing US Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint and Supplemental Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 11/07/11. (Documents sent to Plaintiff) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cge) (Main Document 21 replaced on 11/8/2011) (cge).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
