Brady et al v. Grendene USA, Inc.
| James W. Brady and Patricia M. Brady |
| Grendene USA, Inc. and Grendene S.A. |
| 3:2012cv00604 |
| March 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
422
ORDER: Denying 374 Defendants' Motion For Leave to Amend Counterclaim; Granting 410 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Surreply; Granting 413 Defendants' Ex Parte Request to File Response to Surreply; Granting 377 , 399 , 406 , 411 , 416 Related Motions to Seal. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/6/2015. (srm)
|
|
Filing
418
ORDER Overruling 345 Plaintiffs' Objection to Magistrate Judge's July 24, 2015 Order. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 10/30/2015. (srm)
|
|
Filing
364
ORDER Denying 243 Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Related to Deposition of Expert Witness. Signed by Judge Karen S. Crawford on 9/3/15. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
355
ORDER Overruling Defendants' 240 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Orders Denying Defendants' Request to Compel Compliance with Protective Order Filed April 23, 2015. Judge Crawford's Orders, (ECF Nos. 222, 223), are affirmed. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/21/15.(dlg)
|
|
Filing
336
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 194 Joint Motion to Compel Responsive Rule 30(b)(6) Testimony and Other Issues. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 7/24/2015. (srm)
|
|
Filing
296
ORDER Granting 234 Defendants' Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration; Modifying Sanctions. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/5/15. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
295
ORDER Granting 216 Grendene's Partial Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. Grendene's motion for summary judgment is granted as to all five of the Bradys' causes of action; and Gi ven the Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Grendene, the Court finds good cause to sua sponte consider whether Grendene's counterclaims should be dismissed. The Court sets this issue for consideration at a hearing on July 31, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall each file an opening brief on or before June 19, 2015, and may each file a responsive brief on or before July 3, 2015. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/3/15. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
225
AMENDED ORDER (ECF 210 ): Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Bradys' Motion for Contempt and to Declare Defendants Vexatious Litigants; Vacating Hearing Date. The Bradys' Motion for Contempt for Repeated Violations of Protective O rder, and to Declare Defendants Vexatious Litigants is granted as to holding KMQ and Grendene in contempt and denied as to declaring KMQ and Grendene vexatious litigants; KMQ and Grendene are held in contempt and KMQ is barred from accessing information designated "Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only" by the Bradys' pursuant to the Protective Order in this case; and The hearing set for May 1, 2015 is vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/29/15.(dlg)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER Denying in Part and Granting in Part 162 Defendants' Alternate Request for Relief that Plaintiffs' Counsel Testify Regarding Confidentiality Designations. Defendants' request to depose plaintiffs' counsel regarding the confidentiality designations is denied and defendants' request that plaintiffs reimburse defendants for the cost of cancelling a deposition noticed for October 20,2014, in the amount of $450 is granted. Because both parties contributed to the events giving rise to the instant Joint Motion, the defendants' request for attorneys' fees is also denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 4/22/15. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
214
ORDER denying Defendants' 185 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Hearing set for 4/3/2015 is vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/1/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER: (1) Granting 113 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; (2) Denying 72 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/12/2014. (srm)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER Denying 92 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Likelihood of Confusion. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/5/2014. (srm)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER granting 68 Motion for Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion for Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 74 Motion for Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 88 Motion to Compel; denying 101 Mo tion for Order; Amending Discovery Schedule ( Mandatory Settlement Conference reset for 5/13/2015 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford, Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/25/2015, Final Pretrial Conference reset for 10/2/2015 01:30 PM before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 9/26/2014.(sjt) (Main Document 138 replaced on 9/26/2014) (sjt).
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER Denying without prejudice 90 97 Motions to File Documents Under Seal. On or before August 15, 2014, the parties may file a motion to seal portions of the exhibits. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/8/14. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Denying 34 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel the Depositions of Dal Bo and Grendene S.A. in Florida Without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 12/5/2012. (srm)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER: The Court concludes that limited jurisdictional discovery is appropriate in this case. The Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer (Doc. 13 ) filed by Defendants remains pending. Plaintiffs' request to conduct limited juris dictional discovery is GRANTED. The parties are referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purposes of limited jurisdictional discovery, which shall be completed within 60 days of the date of this order. Plaintiffs shall file a supplemental response to the Motion to Dismiss within 75 days of the date of this order. Defendants shall file any supplemental reply within 90 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/17/2012. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
