Edu-Science (USA) Inc. v. Intubrite, LLC
| Edu-Science (USA) Inc. |
| Intubrite, LLC |
| EDU-Science (HK) LTD. and Edu-Science (USA) Inc. |
| Intubrite, LLC |
| 3:2012cv01078 |
| May 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| William McCurine |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
SECOND AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT. Judgment entered in favor of IntuBrite on Edu-Science (USA) Inc's claim for breach of contract. Judgment entered in favor of Edu-Science (USA) Inc. on IntuBrite's counterclaim for breach of contract. Judgment entered in favor of Edu-Science (USA) Inc. on IntuBrite's counterclaim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability. Judgment entered in favor of Edu-Science (HK) Inc. on IntuBrite's counterclaim for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability. Judgment entered in favor of Edu-Science (HK) on IntuBrite's counterclaim for breach of contract. Court's 199 Amended Judgment entered on 12/1/2015 is vacated. IntuBrite's 200 motion to amend the judgment is granted. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 4/5/2016. (jah)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 129 Motion in Limine to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Dana A. Basney. Court need not exercise its gatekeeping duty to exclude Basney's Report. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 7/1/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER Granting 128 Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: The Court grants in part Edu-Science's motion for partial summary judgment. The Court dismisses IntuBrite's third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh counterclaims and request for punitive damages. The Court denies the motion as it relates to IntuBrite's second counterclaim. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 6/23/15. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER denying 121 Cross-Motion to Quash Subpoena; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion to Compel Production of Documents. IntuBrite shall produce documents responsive to: amended RFP No. 135; and shall produce documents responsive to RFP Nos. 136, 139, 140 and 141-142 as amended by the Court. Production shall be completed within 14 calendar days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 6/17/2015. (jah)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER granting Defendants' 102 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Cross Complaint for Failure to State a Claim; denying Edu-Science (USA) Inc.'s 113 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Edu-HK's Third Amended Crossclaim is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/10/2015. (jah). Modified on 3/10/2015 - Edited text. Regenerated NEF (jah).
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER Granting 77 Motion to Dismiss Cross Complaint. Edu-HK's First Amended Cross-Complaint is Dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court grants leave for Edu-HK to file a Second Amended Cross-Complaint addressing the deficiencies identified above. If Edu-HK chooses to amend, Edu-HK must file the Second Amended Cross-Complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/27/2014. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Denying Intubrite's 60 Motion for Terminating Sanctions. EDU-USA has 21 days from the date of this order to seek a protective order from the magistrate judge as to Ms. Wong. If it fails to do so, Intubrite may bring another motion to compel before the magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/3/2013. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Denying EDU-HK's 34 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/15/2013. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Denying 28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/9/2013. (rlu)(jrd)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/1/12,. ORDERING this case TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. All pending motions in this action are withdrawn, and defendant IntuBrite LLC has 21 days to respond to EDU's complaint following docketing of this action in the Southern District of California. (Kastilahn, A) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/2/2012.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
