Washam v. Evans et al
| Carl A. Washam |
| Jermone Washington and Brandon Evans |
| 3:2012cv02066 |
| August 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Roger T. Benitez |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 6/29/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER: (1) Dismissing Action Without Prejudice; (2) Denying as Moot 8 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and (3) Denying as Moot 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint no later than April 18. 2013. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 3/14/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER: (1) Dismissing Action without Prejudice; (2) Denying as Moot 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and (3) Denying as Moot 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint. Any such amended complaint must be filed no later than February 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 1/2/2013.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
