Rowland v. Paris Las Vegas et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Rowland
Defendant: Paris Las Vegas, Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. and Does 1 to 25
Case Number: 3:2013cv02630
Filed: October 31, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge: Gonzalo P. Curiel
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER Regarding 53 Joint Motion for Determination of Discovery Dispute: The Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff's request for all other discovery is denied. Plaintiff's motion to designate additional expert witnesses, continue trial, and for monetary and non-monetary sanctions is denied. Defendant's motion for monetary sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 12/22/15. (dlg)
August 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER Regarding Joint Motion to Compel Compliance with Discovery Requests (Docs. 26 , 29 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 8/11/2015. (srm)
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER Granting 28 Defendants Motion for Rule 35 Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 8/6/2015. (srm)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: (1) Denying 11 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; (2) Vacating Motion Hearing. Defendants' alternative Motion to Transfer Venue is Denied. The hearing date for this motion scheduled for August 8, 2014 is Vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/6/2014. (srm)
February 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: (1) Granting 3 Defendant Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss; (2) Vacating February 28, 2014 Motion Hearing. Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue is Denied as Moot. Plaintiff granted thirty (30) days leave to amend the Complaint. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/25/2014. (srm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowland v. Paris Las Vegas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Rowland
Represented By: Daniel J. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paris Las Vegas
Represented By: Maria C Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.
Represented By: Maria C Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?