Conde v. Sensa Products
Plaintiff: Jose Conde
Defendant: Sensa Products, LLC and DOES 1-10
Case Number: 3:2014cv00051
Filed: January 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: William V. Gallo
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Antitrust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER denying 134 Plaintiff's renewed Motion for Class Certification. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/10/2019. (jpp)
September 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER denying without prejudice 115 Plaintiff Susan Grace Stokes' motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 9/10/2018. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)
July 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER granting 100 Motion to Excuse Personal Appearance of Susan Stokes at the Early Neutral Evaluation. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 07/07/2017. (ja1)
April 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 80 , 81 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Given the foregoing, the Court grants defendants' Motion to Dismiss regarding the TCV defendants and defendants Goldenberg, Ressler, and Chadwick, an d denies defendants' Motion to Dismiss regarding defendants JustFab and IBH. Although the Court entertains serious doubts regarding plaintiff's ability to successfully amend her Complaint against defendants Goldenberg, Ressler, and Chadw ick, the Court grants plaintiff limited leave to amend regarding these three specific Defendants. To be clear, Plaintiff may not add additional defendants prior to seeking further leave of this Court. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/26/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj)
October 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER granting without prejudice 66 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's claims of alter ego liability as to Defendants O'Reilly, Shay, Congleton, Chadwick, Whittier, Kivel, Campbell, Morano, Francis, Ressler, and Goldenberg are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file any amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified above by November 1, 2016. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/17/2016. (kcm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conde v. Sensa Products
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Conde
Represented By: Timothy Gordon Blood
Represented By: Scott J. Ferrell
Represented By: Thomas Joseph O'Reardon, II
Represented By: Paula M. Roach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sensa Products, LLC
Represented By: Seth Eric Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?