Cortes v. Market Connect Group, Inc. et al
| Cesar Cortes |
| Market Connect Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
| 3:2014cv00784 |
| April 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| David H. Bartick |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER denying 60 Motion for Leave to Seek Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/19/15. (kas)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Certify Class. The named Plaintiff, Cesar Cortes, will serve as the class representative. The Court also determines that the law firm of Emge & Associates can litigate this case competently, and APPOINTS Derek Emge and Suzanne Emge as lead counsel. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/30/15. (kas)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part 34 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. The request to file the exhibits under seal is granted, but the request to file the memorandum under seal is denied without prejudice. If Cortes has some other memorandum in mind, he may bring a renewed motion asking that it be filed under seal. No later than September 1, 2015, Cortes must file the exhibits, lodge copies with the Court, and send copies to opposing counsel. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/28/15. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
