BB Online UK Limited v. 101domain, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District BB Online UK Limited v. 101domain, Inc.

BB Online UK Limited v. 101domain, Inc.

Plaintiff:	BB Online UK Limited
Defendant:	101domain, Inc.
Case Number:	3:2014cv00885
Filed:	April 15, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	XX Outside US
Presiding Judge:	Jill L. Burkhardt
Presiding Judge:	William Q. Hayes
Nature of Suit:	Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 16, 2015	Filing 55 ORDER: The Motion to Modify Case Management Order and to Amend Answer Based on Newly Discovered Evidence (Doc. 43 ) is granted. The Case Management Scheduling Order (Doc. 22 ) is amended to extend the deadline to file motions to amend the pleadings from 10/31/2014 to 1/26/2015. Defendant shall file its First Amended Answer and Counterclaims no later than ten (10) days from the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/16/2015. (mdc)
December 9, 2014	Filing 32 ORDER Denying Ex Parte Motion (Re Doc. 26 ): The Court will, sua sponte, grant plaintiff the opportunity to supplement the joint statement with an opposition to the motion to compel/motion for sanctions. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a suppleme ntal opposition, not to exceed 5 pages (exclusive of exhibits), on or before 12/12/2014 at 05:00 PM. Defendant may file a reply, not to exceed 2 pages (exclusive of exhibits), on or before 12/16/2014 at 05:00 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 12/9/2014. (mdc)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 16, 2015

Filing 55 ORDER: The Motion to Modify Case Management Order and to Amend Answer Based on Newly Discovered Evidence (Doc. 43 ) is granted. The Case Management Scheduling Order (Doc. 22 ) is amended to extend the deadline to file motions to amend the pleadings from 10/31/2014 to 1/26/2015. Defendant shall file its First Amended Answer and Counterclaims no later than ten (10) days from the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/16/2015. (mdc)

December 9, 2014

Filing 32 ORDER Denying Ex Parte Motion (Re Doc. 26 ): The Court will, sua sponte, grant plaintiff the opportunity to supplement the joint statement with an opposition to the motion to compel/motion for sanctions. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a suppleme ntal opposition, not to exceed 5 pages (exclusive of exhibits), on or before 12/12/2014 at 05:00 PM. Defendant may file a reply, not to exceed 2 pages (exclusive of exhibits), on or before 12/16/2014 at 05:00 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 12/9/2014. (mdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BB Online UK Limited v. 101domain, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: BB Online UK Limited
Represented By:	Joel M Weinstein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 101domain, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?