Lewis v. Paramo et al
| Frank Lewis |
| Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris |
| 3:2014cv00890 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 18 as modified. Respondent's 6 Motion to Dismiss is granted. The petition is denied and a Certificate of Appealability is also denied. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/12/15. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Requiring Signature on Motion for Extension of Time and Provisionally Extending Time to File Objections to Report and Recommendation. By a separate discrepancy order, the Court is accepting the motion for filing. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the motion back to Lewis. He must sign and return it to the Clerk no later than March 2, 2015. If he does not, the motion will be stricken. Lewis should assume the motion will be granted and he will have until March 9, 2015 to complete and send in his objections - but only if he signs and returns the motion as directed, within the time permitted. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/13/15.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
