Olivas v. Whitford et al
Petitioner: Oscar Olivas
Respondent: Billy Whitford, Pete Flores, R. Gil Kerlikowske, Jeh Johnson and John Kerry
Case Number: 3:2014cv01434
Filed: June 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: William Q. Hayes
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 278 ORDER: The Motion for Indicative Ruling filed by Respondents (ECF No. 261 ) is granted. The Court indicates that the Motion to Vacate Judgment filed by Respondents (ECF No. 261 ) "raises a substantial issue." Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(b). The Court shall decide the Motion to Vacate Judgment (ECF No. 261 ) "if the court of appeals remands for that purpose." Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(c).. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/4/2020. (ag)
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 250 ORDER Denying 235 Motion to Supplement The Record Filed by Respondents. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/22/19. (dlg)
August 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER: The motion to dismiss or for summary judgment filed by Defendants (Dkt # 209 ) is granted. Based upon the order of the Court filed on 6/28/2016 (Dkt # 167 ) and this order, the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Defendants and against Plaintiff as to all claims in this action. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/16/2017. (mdc)
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER STAYING CASE. Case stayed until leave of the Court of Appeals. The Court concludes that the Plaintiff-Petitioners filing of the Notice of Appealdivested this Court of jurisdiction to adjudicate related claims and enter judgment. This Court cannot proceed further except by leave of the Court of Appeals. This case shall be stayed during the pendency of the appeal. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/27/2016.(acc)
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER Denying 171 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). The parties shall file a status report regarding the resolution of the remaining claims within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/23/16. (dlg)
June 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 167 ORDER: The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Dkt # 1 ) is denied. The parties shall file a status report as to how they intend to proceed on the remaining claims within twenty days of the date this Order is filed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/28/2016. (mdc)
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 22 ) is denied and the Ex Parte Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 48 ) is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/2/2015. (mdc)
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Granting Respondents' Motion For PROTECTIVE ORDER And Denying Petitioner's Motion To Compel (Re Docs. 57 , 58 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 12/11/2014. (mdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olivas v. Whitford et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Oscar Olivas
Represented By: John David Loy
Represented By: Sean Connor Riordan
Represented By: Gabriela Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Billy Whitford
Represented By: Samuel William Bettwy
Represented By: Caroline Jane Clark
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Pete Flores
Represented By: Samuel William Bettwy
Represented By: Caroline Jane Clark
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: R. Gil Kerlikowske
Represented By: Samuel William Bettwy
Represented By: Caroline Jane Clark
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeh Johnson
Represented By: Samuel William Bettwy
Represented By: Caroline Jane Clark
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Kerry
Represented By: Samuel William Bettwy
Represented By: Caroline Jane Clark
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?