Herrera et al v. AllianceOne Receivable Management, Inc. et al
| Gilverto Herrera and Claudia Herrera |
| AllianceOne Receivable Management, Inc and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2014cv01844 |
| August 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William V. Gallo |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant's 100 Motion for Summary Judgment and Setting Pretrial and Trial Dates. The fourth cause of action for invasion of privacy shall proceed to trial on 2/6/2017 at 10:00 AM. The pretrial conference shall be held on 1/23/2017 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/5/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 76 Request to Seal Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 4/6/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
69
DISCOVERY ORDER (ECF No. 67 ). Defendant shall produce any remaining responsive documents and any privilege log on or before close of business on 4/4/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 3/28/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Denying in part and Granting in part Defendant's 48 Motion to Dismiss and Granting Defendant's Motion to Strike. Defendant's motion is Granted in part and Denied in part. Plaintiffs' fifth, sixth, seventh, tenth, and ele venth causes of action are Dismissed without prejudice. Furthermore, the Court strikes the portion of Plaintiffs' FAC that pertains to the FDCPA and the Rosenthal Act. Plaintiff has fifteen (15) days from the filing of this order to file an amended complaint. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/17/2016. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendant's Motion For Partial Judgment On The Pleadings; Granting Defendant's Motion For Partial Summary Judgment; And Granting In Part And Denying In Part Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To Fil e An Amended Complaint (Re Docs. 15 , 19 , 23 ): Causes of action numbers 1, 2, and 6 are dismissed from Plaintiffs' first Complaint as well as the identical claims proposed in the FAC, and causes of action numbers 13-15 may not be included in the FAC. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their first Complaint by adding causes of action 3, 4, 5, 7, 8-12, and 16-17 to the FAC. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 6/18/2015. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
