Pulley v. Paramo et al
Robert G. Pulley |
Daniel Paramo and Kamala D. Harris |
3:2014cv02034 |
August 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Mitchell D. Dembin |
Janis L. Sammartino |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 ORDER Denying 71 Motion to Reopen Proceedings. Petitioner's Motion is DENIED, and this second or successive petition is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability will not issue. Petitioner has not shown "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The judgment and the order dismissing the Petition remain in effect. This case remains closed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/5/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 69 ORDER Denying 68 Petitioner's Motion. Insofar as Petitioner's filing is a Rule 60(b) motion, it is DENIED. Insofar as Petitioner's filing is a second or successive petition, it is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability will not is sue. Petitioner has not shown "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was cor rect in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The judgment and the order dismissing the Petition remain in effect. This case remains closed. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/9/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf) |
Filing 60 ORDER Granting Petitioner's 58 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal. It is ordered that the Court concludes that petitioner's application demonstrates he is unable to pay the requisite fees and costs on appeal. Accordingly, the Court grants petitioner's motion to proceed IFP on appeal. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/22/2017. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dxj) |
Filing 54 ORDER: (1) Overruling 53 Petitioner's Objections; (2) adopting 48 Report and Recommendation; and (3) Denying 1 Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court denies a certificate of appealability because the issues are not debatable among jurists of reason and there are no questions adequate to deserve encouragement. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/14/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kcm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.