Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.
Plaintiff: Presidio Components, Inc.
Defendant: American Technical Ceramics Corp.
Case Number: 3:2014cv02061
Filed: September 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Marilyn L. Huff
Presiding Judge: Bernard G. Skomal
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 577 ORDER granting 576 Joint Motion to dissolve August 13, 2018 permanent injunction. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 11/09/2020. (jpp)
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 574 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendant's Motion to Vacate or Stay Permanent Injunction 571 . Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 2/5/20. (sxa)
April 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 563 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF JUDGMENT PENDING APPEAL ON THE CONDITION THAT DEFENDANT POSTS A SUPERSEDEAS BOND. (Doc. No. 554 .) Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 4/8/2019. (smy)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 533 ORDER denying Defendant's 522 Motion for Partial Stay of Permanent Injunction Pending Appeal. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 10/9/2018. (jah)
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 481 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 471 Motion for Reconsideration and Modification of 466 Scheduling Order. In its motion, Plaintiff notes a typographical error in paragraph 12 of the Scheduling Order related to the deadlines for deposition designa tions. In light of the typographical error, Court amends paragraph 12 of the Scheduling Order to read as outlined in this Order. All other dates and deadlines set forth in the 2/16/2018 Scheduling Order 466 remain as scheduled. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 4/9/2018. (jah)
August 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 440 ORDER (1) Denying Defendant's Motions For Judgment As A Matter Of Law And For A New Trial (Dkts # 399 , 400 , 402 ); (2) Granting Plaintiff's Motion For A Permanent Injunction (Dkt # 373 ); (3) Denying Plaintiff's Motion For Enhanced Damages And Attorney's Fees (Dkt # 377 ); And (4) Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Supplemental Damages And Interest (Dkt # 372 ). Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 8/17/2016. (mdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Presidio Components, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory F Ahrens
Represented By: Miles D Grant
Represented By: Brett A Schatz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Technical Ceramics Corp.
Represented By: Marvin S Gittes
Represented By: Timur E. Slonim
Represented By: Peter F. Snell
Represented By: Howard N Wisnia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?