Simons et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
| Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Charles Simons and Shelden M. Simons |
| U.S. Bank National Association |
| 3:2014cv02138 |
| September 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Rent, Lease, and Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER denying 4 Motion for TRO, denying as moot Motions for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 , 3 . The Court construes the complaint as a new and original complaint, rather than as a notice of removal. It is clear the Court lacks any jurisdic tion over this matter, and this case is therefore dismissed without leave to amend. If there is any need to clarify or amend this order, US Bank may file a motion in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 seeking clarification of this order. The Cl erk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego, North Division, with an annotation indicating that it appears to relate to case 37-2014-00021236. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/10/14. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cc: Superior Court of CA, County of San Diego, North Division)(kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
