Tajonar v. Echosphere, L.L.C. et al
| Jose Tajonar |
| Echosphere, L.L.C., Dish Network Service L.L.C., DISH Network Corporation, Dish Network California Service Corporation and DOES 2 through 50 |
| 3:2014cv02732 |
| November 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ac Diversity-Account Receivable |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 45 Motion for Reconsideration. This case is STAYED while the arbitrator decides on the availability of arbitration of Tajonar's class and representative claims. The arbitrator shall make this decision by September 26, 2016. Tajonar shall notify the Court within 14 calendar days after the arbitrator makes that decision. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 6/27/16. (kas)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Compelling Arbitration and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Since Tajonar's claims are subject to arbitration, the Court GRANTS DISH's unopposed request to dismiss this case without prejudice. The pending motion to amend the first amended complaint (Docket no. 26 ) is DENIED as moot, and the Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 8/10/15. (kas)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying 5 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/2/15. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
