Radevska et al v. Noble Americas Energy Solutions, LLC et al
| Tamara Radevska and Ali Rock |
| Noble Americas Energy Solutions, LLC, Noble Americas Corp., Noble Americas' Cigna Healthcare Open Access Plus Plan, Cigna Corporation and Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv00271 |
| February 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Gonzalo P. Curiel |
| Bernard G. Skomal |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
ORDER Requesting Supplemental Briefing in re Plan Documents and Administrative Record. The Parties are to comply with this Order on or by Tuesday, April 18, 2017. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/10/17.(dlg)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Granting 54 Joint Motion and Stipulation Regarding Proposed Amended Pleadings. The hearing scheduled for April 1, 2016 is vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/17/16. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
36
PROTECTIVE ORDER 35 Entered Pursuant to Joint Motion - As Modified by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 1/5/16. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Denying 11 Defendants Cigna Corporation and Cigna Healthcare of California's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 11/9/15. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
