Zamir v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Nelda Zamir
Defendant: Bridgepoint Education, Inc., Andrew S. Clark and Daniel J. Devine
Case Number: 3:2015cv00408
Filed: February 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 77 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Accordingly, the Court dismisses with prejudice Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint.(mpl)
April 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Granting Defendants' 58 Motion to Dismiss. It is ordered that while the Court entertains doubts concerning lead plaintiffs' ability to adequately re-plead scienter, the Court will grant lead plaintiffs another opportunity to ame nd. Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice lead plaintiffs' SAC. (ECF No. 57.) Lead plaintiffs may file a third amended complaint (TAC) within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Failure to file a TAC by this date may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 4/5/2017. (dxj)
July 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER: (1) granting the Bridgepoint Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice, (2) denying 37 Lead Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, (3) granting 28 the Bridgepoint Motion to Dismiss, and (4) granting 30 the Warburg Motion to Dismiss. Accor dingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice Lead Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 17.) Lead Plaintiffs may file a second amended complaint (SAC) within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed. Failure to file a SAC by this date may result in dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 7/25/2016. (kcm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zamir v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nelda Zamir
Represented By: Casey Edwards Sadler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew S. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel J. Devine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?