Yancy et al v. State of California et al
| Alexis Yancy and Jayden Yancy |
| State of California, California Highway Patrol, City of Imperial, City of Imperial Police Department, County of Imperial, Imperial County Sheriff's Office and DOES 1 through 25 |
| 3:2015cv00580 |
| March 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
219
ORDER Granting 218 Motion for Order Approving Minors Compromise. Court approves the minors compromise of a waiver of costs in exchange for a waiver of Plaintiffs right to challenge the verdict or judgment. Thus, each party to this compromise agreement will bear their own costs. The Clerk ofCourt is instructed to deny all pending motions as moot and to close the file. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/3/2018. (gac)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Granting 26 Motion to Dismiss; Granting Leave to Amend. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/12/2015. (rlu)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Granting Ex Parte 2 Application for Appointment of Guardian ad Litem. Katherine Hawk appointed guardian ad litem for Plaintiffs Alexis Yancy and Jayden Yancy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 4/8/2015. (rlu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
