St. Jon v. Tatro et al
| DJ St. Jon |
| Timothy J. Tatro, Peter A. Zamoyski, Tatro & Zamoyski, LLP, Vincent J. Bartolotta, Jr., Karen Frostrom, Thornes Bartolotta & McGuire, M. D. Scully, William Rathbone, Timothy Branson, Gordon & Rees LLP, City of San Diego, Jan I. Goldsmith, Donald R. Worley, John E. Riley and DOES 1 to 100 |
| 3:2015cv02552 |
| November 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Jill L. Burkhardt |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER Granting Defendants Tatro et al.'s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike 21 ; Granting Defendants Bartolotta, Jr. et al.'s Motion to Dismiss 22 ; Granting Defendants M.D. Scully et al.'s Motion to Dismiss 28 ; Granting Def endants City of San Diego et al.'s Motion to Dismiss 44 ; Denying Defendants City of San Diego et al.'s Motion to Strike 50 ; Denying Defendant M.D. Scully et al.'s Motion to Strike 53 . Plaintiff's federal due process claim is dismissed with prejudice; Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; and Plaintiff is denied leave to amend. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/23/16. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Denying 32 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application For Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/13/2016. (srm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
